 |
Ask the Superintendent -
November 28, 2007
With less than a week to go before the community
votes on the proposed capital project, I would like
to share a few additional thoughts.
- Some people
have suggested this project is too large and too
costly. Reducing this project in size and cost
may seem like the obvious alternative, but there
are major drawbacks to this option:
- Three of
our four schools are currently overcrowded.
This means they are beyond the State of New
York’s functional capacity rating. All three
of these buildings need additions to meet
the growing enrollment.
- If the
project was reduced in scope, the school
district will have to ask the community to
approve another building project shortly
after this one is completed.
- The last
capital project was completed in 2002. In
five short years from that date, we already
require more space. The proposed building
project will meet the needs of the District
for ten to twelve years.
- The Growth
Task Force examined smaller options and
after a great deal of study, concluded the
proposed project was the most cost effective
(the District maximizes its State Aid ratio
of 58.4% with this plan).
- We all
recognize the timing of the proposed capital
project could be better. However, the cost of a
building project will not decrease in the
future. Every year we wait the building cost
escalates at 6%-8% and enrollment will continue
to grow. It is important to remember a building
project is not completed overnight. It takes
five years from voter approval until the project
is completed and available to students.
- There is no
doubt that we all find ourselves trapped in a
broken and antiquated system of financing public
school education. This taxing system may have
worked hundreds of years ago when owning land
equated to having significant wealth. All the
attempts by local and state governments of
creative assessments and equalization rates have
not kept pace with the rising costs of
education. More is being asked of schools by the
state and federal governments, yet the operating
and building aid has fallen over the last twenty
years. Local residents feel “squeezed” by all
the taxes they must pay. School districts are
also “squeezed” because as enrollment grows and
educational expenses rise, administrators under
this current antiquated system have no choice
but to seek funding from school district
residents.
*
* *
* *
The
proposed capital project was planned to meet the
educational needs of our students as well as to
accommodate a growing enrollment. With only a few
days remaining before the proposition vote on
December 4th, there is still time to have your
questions answered by going to our website or by
calling 294-2410.
REMEMBER TO VOTE: DECEMBER 4, 2007 FROM 6 A.M.–9
P.M. AT MAIN STREET SCHOOL.
Roy Reese
Superintendent of Schools |
 |